As I have been watching the political garbage on TV and listening to the Republicans and the Democrats argue, I have come to one conclusion: everyone sees things in black and white. There is no gray area. There is no middle ground. It's either right, or it's wrong. I do not agree with this stand point.
Both parties I believe are at fault for this, but predominantly it is simply the general attitude towards the debate. Is it okay for the woman who was raped to get an abortion? Is it okay to abort the mentally disabled fetus? Where do we draw the line? As in many situations in life, there is no line drawn in the sand dividing right and wrong.
The pro-choice supporters say that a woman should be able to do whatever she wants with her body. It is her choice to have the baby or not. I must ask, what about the baby's body? What about it's right to life? It could be argued that it is not "a person" yet. Where is the line in the sand dividing the "person" from the glob of tissue seen as a parasite in the woman's body? When do basic human rights kick in?
The pro-life section states that as soon as the baby is conceived, it is a person. It has a full set of DNA, it is it's own person. But what about the woman? What if she was raped? What if she'll die carrying the baby? To what extent will we protect a person who has never even seen the light of day?
I present the middle ground. It is the woman who was raped. The woman who was diagnosed with cancer and then got pregnant accidentally. The woman who has a compelling reason to not have that child. It is not the woman from the drunken night at the bar. It is not the woman who had a little too much fun with a man she didn't really know. It is not the teenager who doesn't want to lose her bikini body.
Ethically, I can not condemn a woman for getting an abortion after being raped. I can not scorn the woman who choses her life over her child's. It may not be the choice that I would make, but ethically, is there really anything wrong with that?
I agree with the pro-life movement that abortion should not be a form of birth control, but I agree with the pro-choice idea that sometimes it really is better for the woman to just get an abortion and be done.
However, can we really condone the teenager running to the abortion clinic by the thousands? Is that okay? The abortion option has left my generation numb to the consequences of having sex. The primary purpose of sex is to reproduce. That is what it was meant for. It was not simply meant for pleasure. There are many other ways to make youself feel good, but they all have consequences. For example, eating ice cream. If you eat ice cream every day, you will get fat. It's just commonly known that eating sweets all the time is bad for your health and your appearance. What we've done with sex, however, is remove the consequences. There are many options for bith control, condoms to help prevent STDs, and now abortion if push comes to shove.
Is this okay?
The pro-choice idea is that a woman should have the right to chose what happens to her body. Don't we make that choice when we chose to have sex? I did. I knew full well the consequences of what I was about to do. I did it anyway, though. Having sex is taking a risk. You could become pregnant. Everyone knows that from a very young age.
If the government made a fund to reimburse people who lost bets, would it be supported? No. Why? Because everyone knows that when they gamble they are taking a risk. Why should the government pay to remove the consequences of the risk they took?
In my state of Washington, that is exactly what happens. I come from a public high school in a relatively small town. It's suburbia in all honesty. Plus, it's not even low class suburbia. I come from the lowest class in this area, and we still live in a two story house in a nice neighborhood. It's safe, quiet, and a good place to raise a family. Is it okay that I can list off names of girls that I know that have gotten abortions for no real reason? Is it okay that I run into friends at the DSHS office that are applying for medical coupons to go get abortions? This is reality.
Abortion has become a form of birth control. It is no longer something that is used when your health is at risk or when you were raped or a victim of incest. It is the middle class high school girls who don't want to get in trouble from their parents that are seen at Planned Parenthood.
On the other hand, I have lived through some sticky situations in my short 17 years, and I have actually been raped. I know what it feels like to go out to a friends house and wake up the next morning with bruises on your thighs and upper arms. I try to block out that memory, and I could not imagine having to live with a child from that experience. I could not imagine having to have a baby in my belly for nine months reminding me of that. Plus, there is the bodily damage that occurs. Imagine looking in the mirror after a shower and seeing stretch marks on your stomach from a baby that came from your rape. How would you ever get past that? I don't know if I could, and I'm a very strong person.
There needs to be a middle ground in this debate. Abortion should not be used as birth control, because it's not. It is a traumatic experience for your body, and it does actually end a life that at least would have come into existence. It is also not right to deny an abortion to someone who has a good reason for one.
Abortion should be legal, but it should have more constraints on it. Even if they do not put any real laws against it, the government should not pay for them all. If a woman was really raped, shouldn't she be able to find the $300-$500 dollars to get the abortion? It's really not that much money to most people. Not to mention, most upstanding citizens would not be caught dead in that DSHS office applying for the medical coupon. I know I avoid that place like the plague, even though I have to go there some times to fill out information for my daughter's medical insurance.
This is not a black and white discussion, and it should not be treated as such. This is coming from a mother who, statistically, was the most likely candidate to get an abortion. I got pregant at 15 from a man who was 21 (Don't hate, we're getting married in May, he's an awesome guy) and I was an honors student. I had everything in the world to lose. I have given up a lot for my daughter and I would never make a different decision.
I will probably write more about this later. Check back!
Chatboard (0)